Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD 2013 00654
Original file (PD 2013 00654.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX                 CASE: PD-2013-00654
BRANCH OF SERVICE: NAVY           BOARD DATE: 20140506
SEPARATION DATE: 20020816


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty P02/E-5 (AK2/Aviation Storekeeper) medically separated for bilateral patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS), right greater than left. In February 2000, the CI reported he felt a sudden pain in the right knee while running. Despite conservative therapy over a 16-month period and being placed on Limited Duty (LIMDU), the condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Rating or satisfy physical fitness standards. His LIMDU was extended and he was referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The MEB also identified and forwarded two other conditions for PEB adjudication. The Informal PEB dated 7 January 2002 determined the CI was fit to continue on active duty. The CI requested reconsideration of the findings and submitted additional evidence. The Reconsideration PEB then adjudicated the bilateral PFPS, right greater than left, as unfitting, rated 10% and 0%, respectively. Tripartite right patella was determined to be a condition related to the unfitting diagnosis and was not separately rated. The remaining condition was determined to be C ategory III ( a condition that was not separately unfitting and did not contribute to the unfitting condition ) . The CI conditionally accepted the findings and requested to be allowed to remain on active duty in a permanent LIMDU status through August 2002, which was granted. He was then separated.


CI CONTENTION: “2001- Tripler Army Medical Center was seen on two occasions. Suggested knee replacement surgery on both (L) and (R) knees at that time. A second opinion was sought by the same medical facility. Again, knee replacement surgery was suggested. However, the Orthopedic surgeon recommended to wait until I was older in age and/or could no longer bare with the pain. Very well could be the result of a double ankle sprain suffered while deployed in the Gulf onboard the USS John C. Stennis. Both ankles twisted inward while carrying aircraft equipment down a ladderwell. The ship took high seas which caused my injury and near head trauma. I was issued light duty for >a week. To date, both ankles continue to click and swell as well as both knees. Right knee will make popping sounds when returning from a bent position. Stairs continue to be an issue as sharp debilatating pains in the patella renders me unable to function. I am forced to return to my desk and elevate the knee.”


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The ratings for the unfitting knee condition(s) are addressed below; no additional conditions are within the Board’s defined DoDI 6040.44 purview. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Naval Records.


RATING COMPARISON :

Service Recon PEB – Dated 20020204
 VA - (Exam ~ 5 Mos. Post-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Bilateral Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome, Right Greater Than Left 5299-5003 10% Right Knee Injury 5257 10% 20030110
5299-5003 0% Left Knee Injury 5257 NSC* 20030110
Tripartite Right Patella Related to Unfit Condition Other x 6 20030110
No Additional MEB/PEB Entries in Scope
Combined: 10%
 Combined: 10%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 200 30322 (most proximate to date of separation [ DOS ] ).
* Not Service-Connected (NSC)


ANALYSIS SUMMARY: The Board acknowledges the impairment with which the CI’s service-connected condition continues to burden him but notes that the Disability Evaluation System has neither the role nor the authority to compensate members for anticipated future severity or potential complications of conditions resulting in medical separation. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the Department of Veterans Affairs, operating under a different set of laws.

Bilateral Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome (PFPS). Service treatment records evidence that the CI first presented for bilateral knee pain in March 2000. At that time he reported pain with running. The physical examination was significant for bilateral knee tenderness to palpation at the outside, lower edge of the patella and full active range-of-motion (ROM). A patella grind was noted in the right knee (a test to produce pain in the knee cap that can indicate PFPS). The CI was diagnosed with probable early PFPS and was treated conservatively with anti-inflammatory medications, activity modification and physical therapy. Radiographic evaluation of the knees on 22 August 2000 was normal except for a tripartite patella (a normal variation in the anatomy of the patella). A bone scan performed on 3 October 2000 demonstrated stress changes of the right greater than left patella and mild stress changes in the tibial tuberosity (bony protrusion below the knee), left greater than right. A magnetic resonance image of the right knee performed 22 December 2000 suggested that there was abnormal motion of the right patella with resultant pain. The MEB evaluation performed on 14 September 2001 evidenced use of a right knee brace. The physical examination documented full ROM of the right knee with discomfort and tenderness at the right patella and surrounding area. The narrative summary dated 20 September 2001 evidenced persistent bilateral knee pain despite conservative management and an orthopedic determination that the CI was not a surgical candidate. The knee examination demonstrated significant tenderness to palpation at the inside of the right knee, right patellar area and with pressure applied to the patella. Bilateral knee ROM was noted as approximately 0-130 degrees. At the VA Compensation and Pension examination performed 5 months after separation, the CI reported right greater than left knee pain and weakness. He denied stiffness, swelling, locking and instability. He reported that his employment required a lot of walking and produced mild to moderate pain; which was relieved by rest. He reported use of anti-inflammatory medication as needed and a right knee brace. The knee examinations demonstrated no evidence of painful motion, edema or effusion, instability, weakness, tenderness, redness, heat, or abnormal movement or guarding of movement. The knee ROM was noted as: right knee: 0-135 degrees (5 degrees less than normal), left knee: 0-140 degrees, extension: 0 degree bilaterally.

The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB adjudicated the bilateral PFPS, right greater than left, condition as unfitting rated at 10% (right) and 0% (left) respectively, coded 5299-5003. The VA did not service-connect the left knee and awarded a 10% disability rating for right knee, coded 5257 (right knee injury). The Board noted that there were multiple treatment entries documenting right greater than left knee pain, evidenced by right knee pathology on radiograph and use of a brace for the right knee. The Board noted that the absence of radiographic evidence of left knee pathology and absence of evidenced left knee pain on both the MEB and VA examinations. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the bilateral PFPS condition.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the bilateral PFPS, right greater than left, condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination.


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20130525, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record








                                   
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
Physical Disability Board of Review
MEMORANDUM FOR DIRECTOR, SECRETARY OF THE NAVY COUNCIL OF REVIEW
BOARDS

Subj: PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW (PDBR) RECOMMENDATIONS

Ref: (a) DoDI 6040.44
(b) CORB ltr dtd 15 Dec 14

In accordance with reference (a), I have reviewed the cases forwarded by reference (b), and, for the reasons provided in their forwarding memorandum, approve the recommendations of the PDBR that the following individual’s records not be corrected to reflect a change in either characterization of separation or in the disability rating previously assigned by the Department of the Navy’s Physical Evaluation Board:
- XXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USN
- XXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USMC
- XXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USMC
- XXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USN
- XXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USMC



                                                      XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                            Assistant General Counsel
                           (Manpower & Reserve Affairs)

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00505

    Original file (PD-2014-00505.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The Board must apply separate codes and ratings in its recommendations if compensable ratings for each knee condition are achieved IAW the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) §4.71a. Additionally, he described...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00198

    Original file (PD2012-00198.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudicated the left knee PFPS conditions as unfitting, rated 10% with application of the Veteran’s Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). Post-Sep Left Knee ROM Flexion (140 Normal) Extension (0 Normal) §4.71a Rating 10% 10% The CI was first evaluated in March 2000 for a 2-month history of knee pain while running following trauma. 3 PD12-00198 RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00726

    Original file (PD2011-00726.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    CI CONTENTION : The CI states: “MEB and PEB only looked at Patellofemoral Syndrome for 1 knee. The MEB narrative summary (NARSUM) examination completed in April 2005 noted a long history of bilateral patellofemoral syndrome that had not resolved with bilateral physical therapy, bilateral Synvisc injections, limited duty for bilateral knees, and right knee surgical lateral release and synovitis debridement. The VA C&P examination did measure the ROM of the left knee and it was normal.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01629

    Original file (PD-2013-01629.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Post-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Patellofemoral Pain, Bilaterally… 5099-50030%Patellofemoral Syndrome…Left…525710%20050514Patellofemoral Syndrome…Right…52580%Other x 0 (Not in Scope)Other x 4 Combined: 0%Combined: 10%Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20050608 ANALYSIS SUMMARY :The PEB combined the bilateral knee pain conditions as a single unfitting condition rated at 0%, coded 5099-5003 (analogous to degenerative arthritis).The PEB relied on AR 635.40...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02790

    Original file (PD-2013-02790.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Informal PEB (IPEB) adjudicated patellofemoral pain, bilateral knee, rated 0% with likely application of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy; and the left tibial stress fracture as unfitting, rated 0% with likely application of the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The remaining conditions (back, left hip and asthma) were determined to be not unfitting. The examiner noted tenderness over the left shin.At the VA C&P exam performed 2 months prior to...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 01140

    Original file (PD 2012 01140.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Informal PEB adjudicated PFPS, left knee as unfitting, rated 10%, with cited application of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy. The commander’s statement noted that the CI’s knee prevented him from performing his MOS duties.The MEB narrativesummary (NARSUM) exam approximately 2 months prior to separation documented that the CI reported that most of the sharp pain was located under the knee cap and was increased with walking, running and climbing stairs. ...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01966

    Original file (PD-2013-01966.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Post-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Neck Pain with Radiating Shoulder Pain523710%Degenerative Disc Disease, Cervical Spine5242-500310%20060320Radiculopathy, Right Upper...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00231

    Original file (PD2012-00231.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB adjudicated the bilateral patella femoral syndrome condition as unfitting, rated 10%, with application of the Veteran’s Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). Effective January 2005, the VA assigned separate ratings of 10% for each knee based on new examination evidence supporting separate ratings for each knee. The Board noted that PEBs often combine multiple conditions under a single rating when those conditions considered individually are not separately unfitting and...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 02245

    Original file (PD 2014 02245.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The left knee condition, characterized as “left knee pain with chondromalacia patella” by the MEB, was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AFI 48-123. The Board directs attention to its rating recommendationbased on the above evidence.Although the final PEB diagnosis was persistent knee pain “due to Patellofemoral Syndrome” and the MEB diagnosis was due to “chondromalacia patella,” the NARSUM diagnosis was due to “subluxation.” Radiographs indicated degenerative changes...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00639

    Original file (PD2012-00639.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY SEPARATION DATE: 20030627 NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX CASE NUMBER: PD1200639 BOARD DATE: 20130206 SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SFC/E-7 (96B4H/Intelligence Analyst), medically separated for bilateral knee pain with history left knee lateral release and findings of Grade III chondromalacia of left patellofemoral...